Questions
How do the Fundamental Rights, particularly the right to equality, intersect with the principles of affirmative action, and what constitutional mechanisms exist to reconcile potential conflicts?
Analyze the relationship between the right to life and personal liberty and emerging challenges in the realm of bioethics, including issues such as assisted reproductive technologies and genetic engineering.
Examine the interplay between the right to freedom of speech and expression and the constitutional limitations imposed by defamation laws, exploring the balance between individual liberties and protection of reputation.
Assess the linkage between the right to education as a Fundamental Right and the concurrent responsibility of the state to ensure quality education, and analyze the implications for policy-making in the education sector.
Explore the relationship between the right to privacy and modern surveillance technologies, evaluating the constitutional safeguards in place and potential gaps in protecting individual privacy rights.
Analyze how the right against exploitation, particularly in the context of child labor and bonded labor, intersects with the Directive Principles of State Policy and shapes legislative and policy interventions.
Examine the constitutional implications of the right to property being transformed into a legal right, and its subsequent removal as a Fundamental Right, on economic policies and land acquisition laws.
Assess the intersection of the right to equality and the reservation policy, analyzing how it has evolved over time and its impact on social justice and representation in various sectors.
Explore the relationship between the right to constitutional remedies and the functioning of constitutional bodies, such as the Election Commission, and their role in upholding democratic principles.
Analyze the implications of the right to freedom of assembly and association on issues of public protest and dissent, considering the balance between individual rights and maintaining public order.
Article 12
Info
Def of State Govt, Parl, SLA, LA, OA within Indian territory or in control of Indian territory
- Local auth General Clauses Act 1885
- MCD, Panchayat, Cantonment Board
- Other auth:
- Uni of Madras v/s Shantabai 1954 Uni not State hence FR limitations not applicable on Uni
- Mohanlal v/s Raj Electricity Board 1967 1954 judgement overruled sovereignty not necessary
- OA now = Uni, Corp (LIC, ONGC)
- RD Shetty v/s AAI Test of Instrumentality
Article 13
Info
Law against FR canβt operate
- Law in force
- += delegated legislation
- doctrine of severability
Article 14
Info
Equality before law + equal protection of law Lays down foundation for rule of law
- citizens and non citizens
- E Royappa v/s St. of TN 1973 arbit action violative of Art 14
Article 15
Info
Application of RoE RRCSPoB only for citizens (race, religion, caste, sex, place of birth)
- 15(3) - spl provisions for women / children
- 73rd CAA 1992: Women reservation in Panchayat
- 74th CAA 1992: Women reservation in Municipal
- JJ Act 2015
- refer more
Article 16
Info
Employment RRCSPoB + DR (descent, residence)
- 16(1): eql opp for all citizens
- 16(2): RRCSPoBDR
- 16(3): Parl my by law require residence for job in state (only Parl, NOT state)
- 16(4): provision for (socio, edu, eco) bkwd/ underrep classes
- see also: Reservations and Reservations for EWS
- 16(5): religion as criteria for holding office with affairs w/ religious institution
- 16(6): EWS reservation upto 10% (via 103rd CAA 2019)
Article 17
Info
Untouchability
- Untouchability (Offences) Act 1955
Article 18
Info
Titles, donβt confer, accept (from foreign state) donβt accept foreign gifts, emoluments if working under profit under State w/o Prez perms
- Balaji Raghvan Case 1994 civilian awards not titles (eg. Bharat Ratna)
Article 19
Info
Protection of certain rights regarding FoSE, movement, trade
Parts of 19(1)
- (a): FoSE
- IE v/s UoI 1984 press FoSE
- Naveen Jindal v/s UoI 2004 right to hoist nat flag
- Jehovah Witness Case 1986 right to remain silent
- PUCL v/s UoI 2013 we got NOTA
- ADR 2002 info regarding election candidates
- Shreya Singhal Case 2015 strike down 66(A) of IT Act 2002
- 19(2): reasonable restrictions on FoSE
- sovereignty and integrity, security
- friendly rel. w/ foreign states
- public order, decency, morality
- contempt of court, defamation
- incitement to offence
- (b): peaceful assembly w/o arms
- curbed by Sec 144 CrPC
- Bharat Kr. v/s UoI 1998 Bandh illegal, just protest normally donβt lockdown the city
- (c): form associations, unions, coop soc
- added via 97th CAA 2011
- DPSP 43B
- (d): move freely
- (e): reside and settle
- indian citizen only
- promote unity and integrity, cultural exchange, common market, idea of single citizenship
- not absolute (refer 19(5))
- protection of interest of ST (eg. Inner Line Permit)
- Covid 19:
- NDMA 2005
- Epidemic Diseases Act 1897
- (f): Right to property NO LONGER EXISTS!
- (g): any profession, occupation, trade or business
- 19(6)(i): may prescribe technical, professional qualification for jobs (obv)
- 19(6)(ii): may exclude ALL citizens from certain activities (i.e. State wants to do it)
Restrictions
- 19(2): 19(1)(a)
- 19(3): 19(1)(b)
- 19(4): 19(1)(c)
- 19(5): 19(1)(d) and (e)
- 19(6): 19(1)(g)
Article 20
Info
Protection in respect of conviction for offenses
- 20(1): criminal law
- no retrospective application of criminal law
- no criminal charge for non criminal offence
- canβt inc punishment retrospectively, but can dec
- 20(2): no double jeopardy
- 20(3): no self incrimination / right to remain silent
- Selvi v/s St. of Karnatka Narco test canβt be forced (also rel. Art 21)
Article 21
Info
No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except acc to PEBL
3 req for depriving L/PL
- law must be made by competent auth
- law must provide procedure to deprive
- procedure must be followed by State
Maneka Gandhi vs UoI (Passport)
refer Maneka Gandhi v UOI 1978
- PEBL must be just, fair and reasonable
- 14, 19 and 21 to be seen interrelated
Expanding Scope
- court assumed activist role
- Right to life not just animal existence, but everything that makes life worth living
Environment
- MC Mehta v UoI: Right to health and clean env
- ND Jayal v UoI: Right to sustainable dev
- Subhash Kr v State of Bihar: Right to pollution free air and water
Personal Liberty
- Shakti Vahini v UoI: Right to choose oneβs life partner
- KS Puttaswamy v UoI 2017: Right to Privacy
- Navtej Singh Johar v UoI: Right to choose sexual orientation
- Kiran Bedi v Committee of Enquiry: Right to reputation
- RM Malkhani v State of Maha: Right against phone tapping
Social issues
- Vishakha v State of Raj 1997: Sexual harassment at workplace
- Olga Tellis v BMC: Right to livelihood
- Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka: affordable education (capitation fee)
- Vincent v UoI: Right to health
- Aruna Shaunbagh v UoI: Right to die with dignity
Article 21A
Info
Right to education
- added by 86th CAA 2002
- Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009
- earlier DPSP Article 45 (List of Directives)
- age 6 - 14
Article 22
Info
Protection against arrest and detention in certain cases
- 22(1): no arrest w/o info of grounds of arrest. No denial of right to consult / defended by legal practitioner of his choice
- 22(2): prod b4 nearest maj 24hr
- 22(3): not apply to
- (a) enemy alien
- (b) under preventive detention
- 22(4): no preventive detention law shall auth >3mo detention unless
- (a) advisory board
- (b) law made by parl
- see also: Preventive Detention
Article 23
Info
Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour
- 23(1): traffic in human beings, begar, forced labour prohibited
- 23(2): state may impose compulsory service for public purposes
- in doing so, state must not discriminate on basis of RRCC
- can discriminate on sex
Article 24
Info
Prohibition of employment of children in factories
- below 14 yrs canβt work in factory, mine or hazardous place
- see also: Provisions for Children Welfare
Article 25
Info
Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion
- 25(1) matter
- no forced conversion
- 25(2) state may
- (a) regulate eco, fin, pol, or other secular activity related with rel prac
- (b) provide welfare / reform or opening Hindu religious institutions to all classes
- this article allows Kirpans
- Hindu includes Sikh, Jaina, Buddhist
- see also Court and Religion
Article 26
Info
Freedom to manage religious affairs
- 26(a): establish, maintain insti for rel and charitable purposes
- 26(b): manage own affairs in matter of religion
- 26(c): own and acquire mov/immov property
- 26(d): administer such property in accordance with law
Article 27
Info
Freedom as to payment of taxes for promotion of any particular religion
Article 28
Info
Freedom to attend religious instruction / worship at certain EI
- 28(1): no religious inst at any EI wholly out State funds
- 28(2): EI under endowment or trust requiring rel inst may provide so
- 28(3): person at EI recognized by State or receiving aid out of State fund not forced to partake in rel worship / inst unless consent (person or guardian)
- Aruna Roy v UoI: no prohibition on study of rel philosophy and culture. Comparative study important.
Article 29
Info
Protection of interest of minorities
- 29(1): any section of citizens with distinct language, script or culture has right to conserve the same
- 29(2): no citizen denied admission to EI maintained by State or State fund on grounds only of RRC+L (language)
Article 30
Info
Right of minorities to establish and administer EI
- 30(1): rel or lang minorities have right to est & administer EI
- 30(1A): what?
- 30(2): State shall not discriminate against EI when granting aid on basis of mgmnt of minority
Articles 31A - 31D
- Saving of certain laws
- what?