Issues with removal procedure of judges
refer: Removal of Judges
Link to original
- judges susceptible to political process of voting which may or may not impeach judges despite a 3 member committee holding him guilty
- entire process concerns concerns of a possibility of harming judicial independence
- terms βmisbehaviourβ and βincapacityβ not defined
- process too elaborate and cumbersome
- process hasnβt been able ho hold judiciary accountable
Issues with the collegium system
Link to original
- no transparency
- allegations of nepotism, favoritism
- role of exec compromised & diluted
- balance disturbed
- India only country where judges appt themselves
- checks and balances missing
- tends to favour particular sections of society
- not representative
- no ppl from marginalized sections
- only 11 female judges out of 230+ SC judges
- tend to threaten justice delivery mechanism
- inordinate delays on appt. of HC judges
- depleting numbers in higher judiciary
- can be attributed to lack of secretariat to help collegium in its functioning
- eg. out of sanctioned 1098 strength in 25 HC, only 645 are filled
- Justice JS Verma (principal author in Second Judgesβ Case 1993): collegium system has been a failure
- despite primacy of exec, some of the finest judges appted in first 4 decades
- in last 3 decades, appt thru collegium have often turned out to be erroneous
- some critics argues that collegium system amounts to rewriting of constitution